Canada’s Largest Province Distributing H1N1 Flu Propaganda Kits

Canada is furthering its flu hype agenda with the help of its largest populated province. Ontario’s 10,000 pharmacists are now distributing H1N1 propaganda kits which will help promote untested vaccines and dangerous antiviral drugs.

The Ontario government has asked Ontario’s Community Pharmacies to act as a distribution point for public information on the H1N1 flu. “The initiative is clearly an attempt to sway and control public opinion on the controversies that surround the H1N1 flu, vaccine and antiviral drugs,” said public health specialist Marco Torres.

“As health care providers in the community, pharmacists are accessible and well-equipped to answer questions about H1N1,” says Dr. Donald Low, Microbiologist-in-Chief, Department of Microbiology at Mount Sinai Hospital. “As we learned from the SARS experience, pharmacists play a vital role in addressing people’s questions and concerns.”

The Ontario Health Plan for an Influenza Pandemic 2008 was developed with input from a number of pharmacists, reflecting their role in Ontario’s pandemic response on behalf of big pharma. The Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (OAHPP) supports the Chief Medical Officer of Health in preparing for and responding to the impact of the pandemic in the province.

OAHPP has also launched a study to draw blood from Ontarians to test for antibodies to the H1N1 ‘swine’ flu virus. The study is designed to examine if there is already some type of immunity in the population against the virus. Participants are issued a $5 gift certificate for their time.

Torres stated, “we know that public health agencies are notoriously deceptive when it comes to many of these studies.”

Torres and other public health investigators claim that agencies such as OAHPP have directors with strong ties to big pharma which creates a bias and conflict of interest for every study conducted of this nature. “It is in the best interest of pharmaceutical companies to have as many blood samples as possible to assess the composition of immunoglobins in the general population,” added Torres.

He states that vaccine manufacturers can use and experiment with the blood samples from such studies without direct authorized consent from the donor. “There is always a selfish profit-based motive behind all of these surveys,” Torres concluded.

After reports of impending mandatory vaccinations, Ontario is under pressure by the federal government to ensure compliance and voluntary cooperation for vaccination.

Canada’s strategy to vaccinate its entire population against the
pandemic H1N1 virus has recently come under attack by the country’s leading medical journal. The Canadian Medical Journal fear mongered with intensity, warning that Canadians with the highest risk of developing this flu are more likely to fall victim because they won’t receive shots as quickly as others elsewhere in the world.

That’s because the federal government will use an adjuvant in its vaccine, a move that is supposed to require more regulatory hurdles before mass vaccination. However, due to recent changes in 2007 under international health regulations dictated by the World Health Organization (WHO), emergency pandemic preparedness policies allow Canada to fast track regulatory approval for even the deadliest vaccines without stringent testing. “Vaccinate now, assess complications later,” is new motto.

“The tactic that they’ve taken needs to be adjusted to ‘Let’s vaccinate first and foremost the high-risk groups and then we’ll see.’ ” said Paul Hébert, editor-in-chief, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Since Ontario has roughly one third of Canada’s population, there is a concerted effort by health officials to ensure that the bulk of the 50.4 million doses ordered by Ottawa will be used.

“The role of Pharmacists in that effort is crucial to public perception,” said health policy analyst Tracy Isaacs. “Most people trust their pharmacist to give them accurate and knowledgeable information, but what happens when the information translated to the pharmacists comes from unreputable sources?”

The H1N1 Flu kits offered by Ontario’s pharmacists are setup to dispel myths and promote accurate information. “The main problem with this initiative is that they are only promoting the myths and inaccurate statistics about the H1N1 flu, which is a huge disservice to the people of Ontario,” says Isaacs.

Many critics of Canadian drug policies and dispensement claim the industry is largely self-regulating, with multiple prejudices across the entire process from development to marketing.

Ontario’s Community Pharmacies (OCP) are supported by organizations such as the Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores and the Ontario Chain Drug Association. The associate members include hundreds of biotechnology companies including big pharma giants such as GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) who are solely responsible for the manufacture of all of Canada’s flu vaccines.

“The drug companies tell the pharmacists what to say, how to say it and when to say it,” added Isaacs.

Many of the facts claimed to dispel the myths in the flu kits are parroting erroneous information from the WHO which are largely based on junk science and contradictions. Some of the OCP’s assumed facts are also opposing emerging studies on the dangers of multiple flu vaccines.

For example, on the first page of the document, a factual claim is made on myth #4, stating that while the regular annual flu shot doesn’t provide protection against H1N1, it is still recommended to prevent the seasonal flu virus. This is directly contradicting four Canadian studies where researchers found that people who had received the seasonal flu vaccine in the past were more likely to get sick with the H1N1 virus.

Dr. Michael Gardam, the director of infectious diseases prevention and control at the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion. “We don’t know with this year’s flu shot how it interacts with the pandemic flu shot, so it’s a worry,” he stated.

Other misinformed statements on the document express that adolescents, young adults and pregnant women appear to be at a higher risk or vulnerable to infection. Again, this is based on WHO propaganda who mislead international public health officials into a false perception that there is an increased risk of the pandemic flu in specific vulnerable groups.

To date, there are NO well-documented case studies in any country that establish adolescents, young adults or pregnant women as having an increased risk for pandemic flu. The WHO is well aware of this fact despite its tireless effort to advocate the opposite by manipulating the data. There is equally no substantive or credible nature to this claim since the WHO will not collect data on the spread of H1N1 for ANY age group based on systematic lab confirmation. This was evidenced in British Columbia where public health officials engaged in a cover-up operation to conceal flu origin.

One of the most dangerous claims made by the OCP flu kit is based on the issuance of facts to dispel myth #9 relating to effective treatments for the H1N1 virus. “So far, research shows that two prescription antivirals are effective in treating H1N1 – Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate) and Relenza (zanamivir)” they state. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is also currently recommending the use of antivirals and all individual provincial governments have stockpiled antiviral medications.

Tamiflu and Relenza lower body temperatures, and therefore can also be expected to contribute to the spread of a pandemic. Despite all the documented dangers and side effects of lethal antivirals, the Government of Canada continues to promote them. Numerous reports and studies have already linked Tamiflu to dozens of deaths worldwide in apparently very health children.

The flu kits also encourage the public to contact Ontario call centres (Telehealth) to have their condition diagnosed over the telephone by call handlers with little or no medical training. Call centre misdiagnoses promoting antivirals have recently caused several fatalities in the UK.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency from the UK alerted physicians that Tamiflu can put some people at greater risk of suffering a stroke, a condition far worse than any flu symptom.

The OCP concludes their document by guiding readers to visit what they call “credible websites” such as the WHO and Health Canada. PHAC openly states that they strictly use WHO pandemic guidelines to determine and respond to a public health emergencies of international concern. The WHO has been instrumental in orchestrating the pandemic campaign to sell vaccines and detrimentally affect the health of billions of people on behalf of pharmaceutical conglomerates. To state that their website is biased with underlying motives is an understatement.

The over 50 million doses of H1N1 vaccine in Canada developed by GSK will have the squalene super adjuvant AS03, polysorbate 80, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, and aluminum adjuvant among other toxins.

Adjuvants are known to induce neurological and autoimmune diseases which can cause damage to the central nervous system, behavioral disorders, dementia, neuropathy and can lead to acute systemic collapse and death. High rates of Guillain-Barre syndrome, a neurological disorder that can cause paralysis was a result of adjuvanted vaccines used in the 1976 swine flu scare.

Why is it that the Public Health Agency of Canada finds nothing wrong with injecting Canadians with dangerous adjuvanted vaccines which remain untested? It is certainly a question worthy of great debate among Canadians.

According to infectious disease experts, due to delayed and potentially serious side effects, the timelines for effective safety testing on adjuvanted vaccines should span years from initial clinical trials. Yet the vaccines about to be unleashed on Canadians in November are still being tested after just two months of trials. Data and conclusive evidence on vaccine safety from more than 15 trials from GlaxoSmithKline is still not available to Canadian health regulators.

Since both provincial and federal governments have shown such a high degree of irresponsibility and utter disregard for the health and safety of the country, informed Canadians are rejecting the upcoming vaccine campaigns in record numbers.

Regardless, the future of Canada, its health, its economy and its resources are all in jeopardy as long as malicious public health officials continue to distort reality for the sole purpose of generating profits.

• More articles in the Flu Pandemic Archive
• Most Parents Do Not Want Their
  Kids Getting The H1N1 Flu Shot
• If You’ve Had Last Year’s Flu Shot,
  You May Be More Susceptible to swine flu
• Oprah’s Health Expert, Dr. Oz Promotes
  the Flu Vaccine on Behalf of Walgreens
• Canadian Medical Journal, Population Health
  Expert Call For Greater Pandemic Powers
• Impending Mandatory Vaccinations Will
  Affect The Health, Jobs of Canadians
• Public Health Officials in Canada Engaged
  in Cover-Up Operation To Conceal Flu Origin
• Canada Plans To Vaccinate The Entire
  Population Against H1N1 Swine Flu
• Vaccines Are One Big Experiment Causing
  Hundreds of Diseases In The Modern World
• Drug Industry Investigator Launches FBI
  Request To Investigate H1N1 Swine Flu
• H1N1 Vaccine Shortage Prompts Backtrack:
  One Vaccine is Suddenly Protective Now
• Junk Science and Contradictions Dominate
  WHO Pandemic Statements and Policies
  
• How To Orchestrate An Effective
  Pandemic Campaign For The Flu
• Solutions To Help Those
  Forced To Take The H1N1 Vaccine
• Vaccines Are Producing
  The Pandemic, Not The Flu
• The H1N1 Vaccine Is A Much Greater
  Risk To Your Health Than The Flu Itself
• First Target of Vaccination Campaigns:
  Pregnant Women And Unborn Children
• Governments Massively Stockpiling
  Vaccines For Campaigns This Fall
• Governments Intensifying Fearmongering
  Strategies For Mass H1N1 Vaccinations
• Mass Vaccinations Being Prepared
  For WHO And UN Sponsored Genocide
• Journalist Fired Over Flu Pandemic Lawsuit
• Swine Flu Hype: Political Lies and
  Media Disinformation are Rampant
• Inoculations Are The True
  Weapons Of Mass Destruction
• Baxter Caught Shipping Vaccines With
  Live Avian Flu Virus To 18 Countries Worldwide
• Federal U.S. Laws Will Make Dangerous
  Vaccinations Mandatory For All Americans
• Speculations of Origins of Swine
  Flu Proliferate Across Internet
• The Risks Of Vaccines Currently
  Outweigh Any Benefits To Human Health

Of Old Sat Freedom - Alfred Lord Tennyson

Of old sat Freedom on the heights,
The thunders breaking at her feet:
Above her shook the starry lights:
She heard the torrents meet.

There in her place she did rejoice,
Self-gather’d in her prophet-mind,
But fragments of her mighty voice
Came rolling on the wind.

Then stept she down thro’ town and field
To mingle with the human race,
And part by part to men reveal’d
The fullness of her face –

Grave mother of majestic works,
From her isle-alter gazing down,
Who, God-like, grasps the triple forks,
And, King-like, wears the crown:

Her open eyes desire the truth.
The wisdom of a thousand years
Is in them. May perpetual youth
Keep dry their light from tears;

That her fair form may stand and shine,
Make bright our days and light our dreams,
Turning to scorn with lips divine
The falsehood of extremes!

Mark Lloyd, Racism, Localism And The Fairness Doctrine

Yesterday we did a report on the apparently racist remarks of President Obama’s latest Czar appointment, FCC Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd.

Among the chilling remarks made by Mr. Lloyd (along with those showing his respect and admiration for Hugo Chavez) is the following:

“We’re in a position where you have to say who is going to step down so that someone else can have power.”

Lloyd is referring to the fact that in his (and probably Obama’s) opinion, the administration is in a position to dictate more minority ownership/control over media outlets.

Which of course is un-Constitutional.

And before all of you members of the Kool-Aid Brigade scream that it is within Lloyd and Obama’s power to do this, because the FCC is a government agency, let me explain something to you.

The FCC grants a license to a media outlet, be it a television or radio station, based upon certain criteria and legalities.

As long as the brodcaster stays within those guidlines, the federal government cannot even impose a fine upon the station, let alone remove it’s ownership.

Liberals as a whole froth at the mouth like a pack of rabid dogs whenever it is pointed out that talk radio is dominated by conservative points of view.

Being socialists, they have no respect for the fact that a free-market…Read the rest of this entry

Mission Bay

[A popular residential suburb]

Mission Bay is a seaside residential suburb to the East of Auckland City. It’s definitely a popular spot for joggers with walkways lining the side of the road along the coast line.

[Large field area]

Like many other suburbs, it has a very well maintained park reserve for family activities… which is one of the reason for our trip here.

[Children's playground]

[Kids on the turn wheel]

[Joaquin trying out one of the obstacles]

They even have playground facilities for the disabled here.

[The Liberty Swing]

[People lining up for the mini flying fox]

[And away he goes...]

[Joaquin running around the mazy platform]

[I'm LOST!!!]

[Liberty doing the monkey swing]

Just across the road from the field, there is a good stretch of beach where you can sit back and take in the view.

[The beach]

[Sail boats not too far away]

[A couple paddling their way to shore]

[View of the city skyline and the sun setting from the beach]

#2 Senator Snowe is not on the list of 56!

Senator Olympia Snowe is representing Maine as a Republican.  She has been in office each year since 1994.  The Senator is up for re-election in 2012.

The country was founded on the basis of less government and unalienable rights of the individual to pursue, life, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.  This is supported by less government “controls”, where the people succeed and fail primarily by their own ambitions and efforts.  Let’s take a look at some of the ways Senator Snowe has translated our country’s foundation into her voting practices.

 HR 4104  Senator Snow voted yes;  This was passed by the Senate
  H Amdt 728: Federal Health Plan Contraceptive Coverage Amendment
  H Amdt 723: Increase FEC Funding

Issues: Abortion Issues, Budget, Spending and Taxes
Date: 09/03/1998

Link to Legislation: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:hr4104

In this there was the creation of a National Drug Control Office which took control over drug policies and diminished some of the individual rights of the state to mandate laws and controls that were appropriate for specific state issues.  Today, this has grown to a massive organization that is setting drug policies, allocating sizeable grant funds, and making recommendation on both thing domestically and internationally.  Yes, we need drug policies, but why do we think it takes a massive “overhead” organization rather than the states to mandate these actions?  At most, why couldn’t there be a policy advisor that makes recommendations and observations?

She has consistently voted to support excessive spending (such as the Stimulus bill) and enlarging the government role in people’s lives.  If you think this is incorrect, please look at her voting record.  In 2008 the National Taxpayers Union gave Senator Snowe a rating of F.

Senator Snowe  has grown public policies which encourage irresponsible behavior on the part of people such as those currently on welfare.

Most recently her idea on healthcare to “help the people” is to compromise in a bi-partisan fashion  so something is achieved.   Why would anyone “compromise” on what is right for the people just to get something done?

September 7, 2009

Senator Snowe was interviewed by CNBC.  Please watch this video to get a true picture of her view of reality with our government today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ9MF8ezgSw

CNBC: Do you think Barack Obama is a big-government liberal?

“SNOWE: No, it’s interesting, I don’t. In fact, I almost sense the opposite

 

In closing, I only have one thing to say.  Senator Snowe, It’s time to go.

 

www.texasfor56.wordpress.com

Facebook:  Texasfor56

Twitter: Texasfor56

OKC Surveillance Tapes Mysteriously Skip Explosion (Conspiracy Sunday)

How do four different surveillance cameras go down simultaneously just prior to the OKC bombing and then simultaneously come back up right after the bombing? Perhaps they were all tied to the same system? Not sure, but it seems an odd time for tapes to dump or end, after the beginning of the official day. No expert here…just seems interesting to read about Mr.Trentadue’s wrongful death investigation of his brother’s death while in custody. Also, the failure to release CIA info related to the OKC incident is intriguing.

“The real story is what’s missing,” said Jesse Trentadue, a Salt Lake City attorney who obtained the recordings through the federal Freedom of Information Act as part of an unofficial inquiry he is conducting into the April 19, 1995, bombing that killed 168 people and injured hundreds more.”

“Four cameras in four different locations going blank at basically the same time on the morning of April 19, 1995. There ain’t no such thing as a coincidence,” Trentadue said. (my emphasis)

“Trentadue said he is seeking more tapes along with a variety of bombing-related documents from the FBI and the CIA. An FOIA request by Trentadue for 26 CIA documents was rejected in June. A letter from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which reviewed the documents, said their release “could cause grave damage to our national security.”

Domestic Enemies ?

Lets Get Some Things Straight Here..

Make No Mistake.. Your Liberty IS in Real Danger.

We are embarking on a journey, not of our making, down a path many before us have walked towards a destination called servitude. I said “not of our making” because it is our elected officials, civil servants and political activists who have attained power through lies deceit and our own stupidity that have marked this path and are actively engaged in driving us down it through repressive laws, social manipulation and a complicit media. If this were a 5 mile trip I’d say we’re at mile marker 4.8 today, 9/26/09 on the downhill side and the path has turned slippery.
Before I continue on some things need to be defined, things that need to be defined for All Americans who value their Liberty and need to take a measure of the enemy presently at hand.
Lets start with them.. the enemy.

The oath of office for all elected officials and military contains the words “enemies, both foreign and domestic”. For our purposes its the Domestic Enemy we should be concerned about since they populate a large portion of our government, both elected and civil. They have earned this title, imo, by their actions because they have willfully violated their oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. Some have gone so far in some cases it should be called Treason.

Their oath is sworn before God, the modern version allows substitution of the word “affirm” in place of “swear”, maybe thats why they’ve spent 50 years defiling religion and Christian faith.. no religious belief and the oath has no real value. Here’s a copy of their oaths for effect..

Presidential Oath
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of  my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Military Oath
“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

Congressional Oath
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Supreme Court
“I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

What this means in general terms suited for this commentary is that any action, activity, agenda, ideology or even unintended consequences that result in damaging, subverting, undermining or otherwise countervening the purpose and/or protections of the citizens or their country as promised in the the United States Constitution or the Rights of the people enumerated in its Bill of Rights is a violation of that oath.

The punishment for violating these oaths is covered by Article 5 of the US code and an executive order of all things.. will wonders never cease !

Please read on.

Courtesy of:     http://foavc.org/

Violation of Oath of Office and Walker v Members of Congress

In refusing to obey the law of the Constitution and call an Article V Convention when required to do so, the members of Congress not only violated federal income tax law but their oath of office as well. The Constitution requires that all members of Congress must take an oath of office to support the Constitution before assuming office. In order to comply with the Constitution, Congress has enacted federal laws to execute and enforce this constitutional requirement.

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

Congress has never altered the Article V Convention clause by constitutional amendment. Hence, the original language written in the law by the Framers and its original intent remains undisturbed and intact. That law specifies a convention call is peremptory on Congress when the states have applied for a convention call and uses the word “shall” to state this. The states have applied. When members of Congress disobey the law of the Constitution and refuse to issue a call for an Article V Convention when peremptorily required to do so by that law, they have asserted a veto power when none exists nor was ever intended to exist in that law. This veto alters the form of our government by removing one of the methods of amendment proposal the law of the Constitution creates. Such alteration without amendment is a criminal violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 and 18 U.S.C. 1918.

In addition, the members of Congress committed a second criminal violation of their oaths of office regarding an Article V Convention call. 5 U.S.C. 7311 clearly specifies it is a criminal violation for any member of Congress to advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government. The definition of the word “advocate” is to: “defend by argument before a tribunal or the public: support or recommend publicly.”

The single intent of the federal lawsuit Walker v Members of Congress (a public record) was to compel Congress to obey the law of the Constitution and call an Article V Convention as peremptorily required by that law, the original intent of which has never altered by constitutional amendment. The lawsuit was brought because Congress has refused to obey the law of the Constitution. Such refusal obviously establishes the objective of the members of Congress to overthrow our form of government by establishing they (the members of Congress) can disobey the law of the Constitution and thus overthrow our constitutional form of government.

The word “peremptory” precludes any objection whatsoever by members of Congress to refuse to call an Article V Convention. This peremptory preclusion certainly includes joining a lawsuit to oppose obeying the law of the Constitution and it may be vetoed by members of Congress. That act not only violates the law of the Constitution but 5 U.S.C. 7311 as well. When the members of Congress joined to oppose Walker v Members of Congress their opposition became part of the court record and therefore a matter of public record. Thus, regardless of whatever arguments for such opposition were presented by their legal counsel to justify their opposition, the criminal violation of the oath of office occurred because the members of Congress joined the lawsuit to publicly declare their opposition to obeying the law of the Constitution. Comments

It would appear that we could empty both houses, the executive and scotus with this code alone, all we need are some honest, real live Americans to get things started. To paraphrase another familiar quote..

“by their actions you will know them”

AN EXCERCISE IN STUPIDITY

It’s hard to determine what was the dumbest play Nevada made all night, but here are the choices:

-Using three timeouts on the first drive
-Trying to catch that first punt
-Personal foul on the fumble with 23 seconds left.
-Going for 2 after the 13-12 TD
-Timeout on the 31-19 2 point conversion.
-offsides on 3rd on 4 with a minute left.
-fill in the blank.*

*This wasn’t Nevada’s fault, but I tweeted about the illegal pick play call. This was the worst call I have seen in awhile. I’ll give the refs the benefit of the doubt on this one and say the LoS was at the 3, and he caught the ball at the one and a half. Neither of those are true. Still, that is 1.5 yards. 4 and a half feet. Even #MitchLowe’s fully erect penis would fit in that distance. Just a brutal call.

Luckily for Nevada none of that garbage cost them the game. Nevada’s secondary, and an unfortunate turnover cost them the game.

Nevada had the most incompetent secondary I have ever seen(hyperbole!). Missouri is not a good football team. When they face a Big12 defense with an actual secondary they are going to get killed. Nevada won the battle of the lines in that game and a combination of an inept secondary, worse than inept coaching and unfortunate turnovers were too much for them to overcome.

South Florida +14 -104(1)
Not my favorite play, but I don’t see how I can avoid it.

Rice +6.5 -103(1)
I never really had time/or cared at the time to explain why I played USC for a 4, and Nevada for a 2. Nevada had all the contrarian makings of a max play, but at the end of the day I just kept getting the “who really cares” feeling in that game. USC-Ole Miss on the other hand stuck out to me as a game people would be talking about. I’m not sure that was the right call over the long run, but I feel more confident in a game that leads SportsCenter against a game that falls somewhere between the Steve Marino Tour Championship highlights and off-season NHL news. Why do I bring this up? Well, because Rice +7 against Vandy violates the “Who really cares” rule. Not sure this game will get much attention, but I’ve heard Rice called out as awful several times this season and they are a well deserved 0-3.

My biggest concern is that I get pissed that Rice loses by 14 after being outgained by 4 yards and I force a double next week against Tulsa.

Illinois +14 -104(1)
I could be totally wrong about this, because I’m basing it on one game, but I think USC loss to Washington confirms everything I believed about both teams. Namely, they were both overrated.

Bowling Green +16.5 -106(1)
One of my biggest problems in year’s past has been losing against an overrated small conference team that shouldn’t have won/covered and then fading them for three straight weeks because I was mad. That could apply here, but the consensus seems to be on Boise State.

-Passing USC on the Detroit Lions corollary. -45 is the definition of a number I just don’t want to lay ever, but Washington State has a history of being horrendously bad(+7 AT HOME vs. SMU). If they were 5-6 last year, fine I’ll take this, but 2 wins last season over a winless team and Portland State, while probably meaningless, is just too much to ignore.

-My next biggest pass was Clemson. I get the growing feeling Clemson-Miami are the two best teams in the ACC speaking in terms of pure power ratings. Under a FG at home against a ranked team is tempting, but Dabo Swinney will surely make 2 crucial mistakes and Clemson isn’t all that unpopular to begin with.

-Should have played Missy St. early in the week. Had a strong feeling LSU is not that good and everyone thinks Mississippi State is terrible. Well, everyone except sharps and Vegas. Sliding down from over 14 to 12 is a huge move to take now. I’d feel great at 14, 12 is probably a pretty fair line.

-4 Games. Weak.

-It’s time to get involved with some small schools. Delaware +5.5 -110(.5) I’m slightly partial to Delaware, but they did go 4-8 last year and are taking on a William and Mary team with a D-1A win. Delaware pilfered Penn St. back-up Pat Devlin and I don’t think there is a huge difference between Delaware and the top of the CAA(Richmond, Villanova, JMU, W&M).

WMI +37 -110(.5) got hammered against almost equivalent JMU squad last week and now faces a top-ranked Richmond squad which beat Hofstra 47-0 last week. Since there is a playoff, which Richmond will almost certainly make, you won’t have to worry about the Urban Meyer dick FG to cover, either.

Finally, a contrarian 1-aa card wouldn’t be complete without Liberty +5.5 -110(.5) against JMU. I really only follow the CAA, and couldn’t tell you anything meaningful about Liberty, other than that I think it is in Lynchburg, but they are only getting 5.5 points from a team that took Maryland to overtime. Liberty is not the traditional D-1aa powerhouse that James Madison is.

Good luck to all. I’ll certainly need it after taking a whole paragraph to explain why I don’t like betting games that people don’t care about, then risking approximately 3.5 units on Delaware, Liberty, WMI, Rice and Bowling Green.*

*You probably thought the title only referred to Chris Ault.

Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu Speaks Truth To Evil and Power--Where Will The American People and President Obama Stand?

Netanyahu U.N. Speech – (1 of 3)

 

Netanyahu U.N. Speech – (2 of 3)

 

Netanyahu U.N. Speech – (3 of 3)

 

The simple and direct truth of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s  speech at the United Nations confronts the evil of the Iranian regime and its allies Hesbollah.

The United States for nearly thirty years has also been attacked by the Iranian regime, mainly through the use of proxies such as Hesbollah.

Beirut Remembered

 

The time has come to destroy both the nuclear and missile weapons systems sites of Iran and overthrow the Iran regime.

Will the United States stand with Israel or will the United States appease with the terrorists?

The American people want the United States of America to stand with Israel and they want the nearing future nuclear missile threat from Iran dealt with and the talking stopped.

The President of the United States would shamefully appease the terrorists and give aid and comfort to the Iranian regime.

The President’s Message to the Iranian People

President Obama’s special video message for all those celebrating Nowruz, or “New Day.” This year, the President wanted to send a special message to the people and government of Iran, acknowledging the strain in our relations over the last few decades. After committing his administration to a future of honest and respectful diplomacy, he addresses Iran’s leaders directly. (this video is public domain)

Instead President Obama is more concerned with the threat of climate change or global warming and implementing the United Nations Agenda 21 for sustainable development.

UN Listens To Obama On Climate Change

 

Agenda 21 & the Club of Rome

 

Obama on Track For Agenda 21

 

The United Nations is a corrupt and failed institution.

Repeatedly the United Nations has aided and sided with the forces of evil by not acting to secure human life and peace.

This is to be expected where over 50% of the 192 member nations are dictatorships and tyrannies and only a minority of member nations are democracies.

The United States should withraw from the United Nations as a member nation and stop funding this corrupt and failed institution.

 

Top 10 donators to the UN budget, 2009[43] Member state Contribution
(% of UN budget)  United States 22.00%  Japan 16.624%  Germany 8.577%  United Kingdom 6.642%  France 6.301%  Italy 5.079%  Canada 2.977%  Spain 2.968%  China 2.667%  Mexico 2.257% Other member states 23.908%

 

 

Background Articles and Videos Holy War (Part 1 of 2)

 

Holy War (Part 2 of 2)

 

HEZBOLLAH HIZBULLAH-BEST EVER GLIMPSE OF HEZBULLAH-MustWatch

Hezbollah

“…Hezbollah[1] (Arabic: حزب الله‎ ḥizbu-’llāh(i),[2] literally “party of God”) is a Shi’a Islamist political and paramilitary organisation based in Lebanon.[3] Hezbollah is now also a major provider of social services, which operate schools, hospitals, and agricultural services for thousands of Lebanese Shiites, and plays a significant force in Lebanese politics.[4] It is regarded as a resistance movement throughout much of the Arab and Muslim world.[3] Many governments, including Arab ones, have condemned actions by Hezbollah while others have praised the party.[5][6] Several western countries regard it in whole or in part as a terrorist organization.[7]

Hezbollah first emerged as a militia in response to the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, also known as Operation Peace for Galilee, in 1982, set on resisting the Israeli occupation of Lebanon during the Lebanese civil war.[3][8] Its leaders were inspired by Ayatollah Khomeini, and its forces were trained and organized by a contingent of Iranian Revolutionary Guards.[9] Hezbollah’s 1985 manifesto listed its three main goals as “putting an end to any colonialist entity” in Lebanon, bringing the Phalangists to justice for “the crimes they [had] perpetrated,” and the establishment of an Islamic regime in Lebanon.[10][11] Hezbollah leaders have also made numerous statements calling for the destruction of Israel, which they refer to as a “Zionist entity… built on lands wrested from their owners.”[10][11]

Hezbollah, which started with only a small militia, has grown to an organization with seats in the Lebanese government, a radio and a satellite television-station, and programs for social development.[12] Hezbollah maintains strong support among Lebanon’s Shi’a population, and gained a surge of support from Lebanon’s broader population (Sunni, Christian, Druze) immediately following the 2006 Lebanon War,[13] and is able to mobilize demonstrations of hundreds of thousands.[14] Hezbollah alongside with some other groups began the 2006–2008 Lebanese political protests in opposition to the government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora.[15] Later dispute over Hezbollah preserve its telecoms network led to clashes and Hezbollah-led opposition fighters seized control of several West Beirut neighborhoods from Future Movement militiamen loyal to Fouad Siniora, this areas then handed over to the Lebanese Army.[16] Finally, on the basis of Doha Agreement, Hezbollah was granted veto power in Lebanon’s parliament. In addition, National unity government was formed which Hezbollah has one minister and controls eleven of thirty seats in it.[4][17]

Hezbollah receives its financial support from Iran, Syria, and the donations of Lebanese and other Shi’a.[18][19] It has also gained significantly in military strength in the 2000s.[20] Despite a June 2008 certification by the United Nations that Israel had withdrawn from all Lebanese territory,[21] in August of that year, Lebanon’s new Cabinet unanimously approved a draft policy statement which secures Hezbollah’s existence as an armed organization and guarantees its right to “liberate or recover occupied lands.” Since 1992, the organization has been headed by Hassan Nasrallah, its Secretary-General.

Radical Islam: In their own words (Part 1 of 6)

 

Radical Islam: In their own words (Part 2 of 6)

 

Radical Islam: In their own words (Part 3 of 6)

 

Radical Islam: In their own words (Part 4 of 6)

 

Radical Islam: In their own words (Part 5 of 6)

 

 

United Nations

“…The United Nations (UN) is an international organization whose stated aims are facilitating cooperation in international law, international security, economic development, social progress, human rights, and the achieving of world peace. The UN was founded in 1945 after World War II to replace the League of Nations, to stop wars between countries, and to provide a platform for dialogue. It contains multiple subsidiary organizations to carry out its missions.

There are currently 192 member states, including nearly every sovereign state in the world. From its offices around the world, the UN and its specialized agencies decide on substantive and administrative issues in regular meetings held throughout the year. The organization is divided into administrative bodies, primarily: the General Assembly (the main deliberative assembly); the Security Council (decides certain resolutions for peace and security); the Economic and Social Council (assists in promoting international economic and social cooperation and development); the Secretariat (provides studies, information, and facilities needed by the UN); the International Court of Justice (the primary judicial organ). Additional bodies deal with the governance of all other UN System agencies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Food Programme (WFP) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The UN’s most visible public figure is the Secretary-General, currently Ban Ki-moon of South Korea, who attained the post in 2007. The organization is financed from assessed and voluntary contributions from its member states, and has six official languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish.[2]

…”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations 

 

United Nations Articles 

http://www.unisevil.com/temp213.htm

 

The United Nations–
United ThugsR.J. Rummel

 

“…One of the most telling cases is the mass murders, and government created famine in North Korea. The country is one vast prison in which hundreds of thousands have been murdered in the last decade, and possibly three million have been starved to death. Still, except for food aid the UN is trying to provide the North Korean people, with regard to the ruling thugs responsible, the UN is like the three monkeys that see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil.

Similarly with the Taliban of Afghanistan, who when they controlled the country were systematically murdering their own people, repressing all their human rights, and enslaving all woman. The UN sat on its hands despite the written reports it received from its officials in the country pointing out that the murders were ordered or approved by Mullah Omar, the Taliban ruler. Just consider the Taliban murder of 178 people in the Yakaolang district of north-central Afghanistan, where UN officials had evidence that Omar was in contact with the Taliban troops doing the democide. One UN official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, exclaimed that, “These are the same type of war crimes as were committed in Bosnia and should be prosecuted in international courts.” Out of frustration that the UN was doing nothing to stop the Taliban, staff members leaked their reports to the public.

Then, consider Rwanda, in which during four months of 1994 about 800,000 people were murdered in a systematic genocide organized by the Hutu government, and carried out against the Tutsi minority by its troops, police, and specially trained death squads. In 1999, an independent report, commissioned by Secretary-General Kofi Annan, and headed by former Swedish Prime Minister Ingvar Carlsson, condemned the UN’s reluctance to accept evidence of a genocide, and reluctance to act once the genocide was undeniable.

Perhaps the most famous case, although the genocide involved a much lower number of murdered–around 8,000 Muslim men and boys–was in Srebrenica, Bosnia, during the Bosnian war of 1995. Another UN commissioned report on this asserted that the UN peacekeepers stood by while Serb troops massacred those to whom the UN had promised protection. The UN had refused to reinforce their peacekeepers with enough troops, and even then severely restricted the action of those that were there.

Presently, there are a civil war and the mass murders in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. And again, UN peacekeepers are under armed, under manned, and over restricted by rules of engagement. Some three million Congolese have been killed so far, but all UN peacekeepers have done is stand by and watch them being murdered. In response, the UN Security Council voted to deploy an additional French led 1,400 soldiers to Bunia, the capital. But, their mandate was temporarily confined to Bunia–they could not leave it to protect refugees in neighboring areas where most of the killing was taking place. As this killing escalated, the UN deployed a new force of 3,000 Pakistani and Bangladesh troops with permission to prevent killing and violence across the whole Ituri region–3,000 UN peacekeepers across a region over twice the size of Albania.

There is also Russia’s Moslem Chechnya in which Russian troops and agents have carried out a campaign of democide, torture, and war crimes. In 2000 and 2001, the Human Rights Commission noted Russian abuses there and asked that the Russian government investigate them, and cooperate with UN human rights monitors. At no cost to itself from the UN, Russia has ignored these resolutions and in 2003 a similar resolution failed to get enough votes. …”

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COMM.11.10.03.HTM

  Agenda 21

“…Agenda 21 is a programme run by the United Nations (UN) related to sustainable development. It is a comprehensive blueprint of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the UN, governments, and major groups in every area in which humans impact on the environment.

 

The full text of Agenda 21 was revealed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit), held in Rio de Janeiro on June 14, 1992, where 178 governments voted to adopt the programme. The final text was the result of drafting, consultation and negotiation, beginning in 1989 and culminating at the two-week conference. The number 21 refers to an agenda for the 21st century. It may also refer to the number on the UN’s agenda at this particular summit.

 

Agenda 21 Text

http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml

 

  Agenda 21 for a U.N. Dictatorship pt.1/2

 

Agenda 21 for a U.N. Dictatorship pt. 2/2

 

 

Anti-Communitarian League http://nord.twu.net/acl/agenda21.html
    Israel has no choice but to be tough on Hamas – and Iran The dangers from Tel Aviv’s enemies are rising while its support around the world falls Benny Morris “…Israeli foreboding has general sources and specific causes. The general problems are simple. First, the Arab and wider Islamic worlds have never accepted the legitimacy of Israel’s creation or the continued existence of the Jewish state, notwithstanding Israel’s peace treaties with the Egyptian and Jordanian regimes, signed respectively in 1979 and 1994. Second, public support for Israel in the West (and in democracies, governments can’t be far behind) has steadily withered over the past few decades, as the memory of the Holocaust – which in an ill-defined but general way underwrote Israel – has dimmed and as Arab power and assertiveness have surged. As well, the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip and its occasionally heavy-handed treatment of the Arabs have played a part. More specifically, Israel faces a combination of dire short- and medium-term threats. To the east, Iran is advancing its nuclear project, which most Israelis and most of the world’s intelligence services believe is designed to produce nuclear weapons. The fact that Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has repeatedly threatened Israel with destruction quite naturally leaves Israelis deeply perturbed. In the next year or so, if the world community does not force the Iranians through diplomacy and economic sanctions to halt their nuclear programme, then either the US or Israel will have to attack and destroy the Iranian nuclear facilities. To the north lies another threat: Hezbollah, a fundamentalist Shi’ite Muslim organisation that vows to destroy Israel and is funded by Iran. It has recovered from the thrashing it received in 2006 when Israeli forces struck into south Lebanon and reportedly now has an arsenal of 30,000-40,000 rockets, some of which can reach Tel Aviv and Dimona, the site of Israel’s nuclear facility. To the south, Hamas will remain Israel’s implacable foe, its charter/constitution of 1988 proclaiming the necessity of Israel’s destruction “at the hands of Islam”. …” http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article5439608.ece     Hamas “…Hamas (حماس Ḥamās, an acronym of حركة المقاومة الاسلامية Ḥarakat al-Muqāwamat al-Islāmiyyah, meaning “Islamic Resistance Movement”) is a Palestinian Islamic socio-political organization which includes a paramilitary force, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades.[2][3] Since June 2007, after winning a large majority in the Palestinian Parliament and defeating rival Palestinian party Fatah in a series of violent clashes, Hamas has governed the Gaza portion of the Palestinian Territories. The European Union, the United States, and three other countries have classified Hamas as a terrorist organization. Hamas was created in 1987 by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi and Mohammad Taha of the Palestinian wing of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood at the beginning of the First Intifada, an uprising against Israeli rule in the Palestinian Territories. Hamas launched numerous suicide bombings against Israelis, the first of them in April, 1993.[5] Hamas ceased the attacks in 2005 and renounced them in April, 2006.[6] Hamas has also been responsible for rocket attacks, improvised explosive device attacks, and shootings, but it reduced those operations in 2005 and 2006.[7] In January 2006, Hamas was successful in the Palestinian parliamentary elections, taking 76 of the 132 seats in the chamber, while the previous ruling Fatah party took 43.[8] After Hamas’s election victory, violent and non-violent infighting arose between Hamas and Fatah.[9][10] Following the Battle of Gaza in June 2007, elected Hamas officials were ousted from their positions in the Palestinian National Authority government in the West Bank and replaced by rival Fatah members and independents. Hamas retained control of Gaza.[11][12] On June 18, 2007, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (Fatah) issued a decree outlawing the Hamas militia.[13] Israel then immediately imposed an economic blockade on Gaza, and Hamas launched Qassam attacks on areas of Israel near its border with Gaza.[14] After the end of a six-month ceasefire the conflict escalated, and the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict began when Israel invaded Gaza]] in late December, 2008.[15] Israel withdrew its forces from Gaza in mid-January 2009,[16] but has maintained its blockade of Gaza’s border and airspace. Through its funding and management of schools, health-care clinics, mosques, youth groups, athletic clubs and day-care centers, Hamas by the mid-1990s had attained a “well-entrenched” presence in the West Bank and Gaza.[17] An estimated 80% to 90% of Hamas revenues fund health, social welfare, religious, cultural, and educational services.[18][19][20] Hamas’s 1988 charter calls for replacing the State of Israel with a Palestinian Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.[21] However, Khaled Meshal, Hamas’s Damascus-based political bureau chief, stated in 2009 that the group would accept the creation of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders and, although unwilling to negotiate a permanent peace with Israel, has offered a temporary, long-term truce, or hudna, that would be valid for ten years.[22] Hamas describes its conflict with Israel as neither religious[23] nor antisemitic;[24][25] the head of Hamas’s political bureau stated in early 2006 that the conflict with Israel “is not religious but political”, and that Jews have a covenant from God “that is to be respected and protected.”[23] Nonetheless, the Hamas Charter and statements by Hamas leaders are believed by some to be influenced by antisemitic conspiracy theories.[26] According to the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Hamas is also anti-capitalist, and believes that the free market economy is against Islamic teachings. Hamas is described as a terrorist organization by the governments of Canada,[27] the European Union,[28][29][30] Israel,[31] Japan,[32] and the United States.[33] Australia[34] and the United Kingdom[35] list the military wing of Hamas, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, as a terrorist organization. The US and the EU have implemented restrictive measures against Hamas on an international level.[36][37] …” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas   Hamas-Iran links full of contradictions, but also interests “…When Iraq hung Saddam Hussein, furious Sunni Muslims in the militant group Hamas held mourning ceremonies. That did not sit well with Shi’ite Muslim Iran, one of Hamas’ key backers but also a strong Saddam foe.  

Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal welcomed by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, left, at the start of a meeting in Teheran.
Photo: AP [file] , AP

Yet the dispute over Saddam’s execution did not break the Hamas-Iran alliance, either.

Instead the two – bound by common strategic interests – have solidified their relationship in the last year, creating a growing worry for both some Arab countries and for Israel.

Israel has in recent weeks accused Iran of training Hamas militants from Gaza and smuggling weapons to Hamas. The weekend formation of a Palestinian coalition government between Hamas, which won a democratic election a year ago, and the more moderate Fatah is sure to bring new attention to the issue.

At their core, Iran and Hamas are far apart ideologically: Iran espouses a fundamentalist Shiite version of Islam, while Hamas adheres to an equally strict rival Sunni version.

But when it comes to Hamas, Iran’s interests are based primarily on its rivalry with Washington and with its Arab allies for influence in the region. …”

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879117625&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

 

 

2008 Presidential Debate: Obama, McCain on Iran 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Posts On Pronk Palisades  

Muslim Prayer in the U.S. (Friday, September 25, 2009)

Attorney that has represented terrorists is promoter for day of prayer on Capitol Hill? Really? So controversial, because of the event coordinator, that even CAIR is bowing out? Freedom of religion used as a wedge to open the crack………….   Little by little. Our immigration policy (legal and illegal) has stood us well, hasn’t it?   

This little FactCheck blurp is interesting for the typical supposed accuracy assessment. A tip off of bias…obvious to me…is how could any of this be true…he was a tailback at Bucknell for Allah’s sake. Of course it is a day of prayer with tours for little Muslim elves to tour the public sites. How inclusive. How melting pot of you. Of course, event organizers want as many as 50,000 Muslims to descent upon the spot. Will organizers bring the prayer mats….?

Something that needs to be read...

This is a very good letter to the editor. This woman made some good points. For some
reason, people have difficulty structuring their arguments when arguing against
supporting the currently proposed immigration revisions. This lady made the argument
pretty simple… Not printed in the Orange County Paper . Newspapers simply
won’t publish letters to the editor which they either deem politically incorrect
(read below) or which does not agree with the philosophy they’re pushing on the
public. This woman wrote a great letter to the editor that should have been
published; but, with your help it will get published via cyberspace.

From: ‘David LaBonte’

My wife, Rosemary, wrote a wonderful letter to the editor of the OC Register which,
of course, was not printed. So, I decided to ‘print’ it myself by sending it out on
the Internet. Pass it along if you feel so inclined. Written in response to a series
of letters to the editor in the Orange County Register :

Dear Editor:
So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of
immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty
because the people now in question aren’t being treated the same as those who passed
through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.

Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why
today’s American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer.
Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United
States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be
documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground.
They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad
times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households
and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.

They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and
did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture.
Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect
them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to
trade for a future of prosperity.

Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out… My father fought
along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France
and Japan . None of these first generation Americans ever gave any thought about
what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler,
Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan They were defending the United States of
Americas one people.

When we liberated France , no one in those villages was looking for the French
American or the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw
only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country.. Not one of
those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country’s flag and
waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents
who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to
be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.

And here we are in 2009 with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and
privileges.. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules,
one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their
mother country. I’m sorry, that’s not what being an American is all about. I believe
that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900’s deserve better
than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to
create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life
I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those
waving foreign country flags.

And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to
mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn’t start
talking about dismantling the United States just yet.

(signed) Rosemary LaBonte

KEEP THIS LETTER MOVING. FOR THE WRONG THINGS TO PREVAIL THE RIGHTFUL MAJORITY NEEDS
TO REMAIN COMPLACENT AND QUIET. LET THIS NEVER HAPPEN.

"Essential Liberty Project"

If you don’t like what is taught in today’s schools and colleges about the proper role of government then you might be interested in this.

Fellow Patriots,

Please take a moment to read about a critical Constitution education initiative.

The mission of the “Essential Liberty Project” is to support the restoration of constitutional integrity and Rule of Law. Our objective is to distribute millions of Essential Liberty booklets to high school and collegiate students. As a primer on liberty, as “endowed by our Creator” and codified by our Founders in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, these booklets have a proven record as an outstanding resource for young Patriots. That success is attributed to both its comprehensive introduction on the history of American Liberty by Mark Alexander, and its compact size — which is to say it is at hand for debate, anytime, anywhere.

Please help us launch the Essential Liberty Project in one of two ways:

First, if you are a parent or grandparent of a high school or college student, please consider providing these Essential Liberty Constitution booklets to your student’s entire class, grade or school. The booklets are available in bulk from PatriotShop.US.

Second, if you would rather sponsor the distribution of Essential Liberty booklets to student groups, organizations, clubs, military units, etc., you can do so at our Essential Liberty Project sponsorship page.

At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked if the delegates had formed a republic or a monarchy. “A republic,” he responded, “if you can keep it.”

We invite you to support the Essential Liberty Project, and help restore Rule of Law for our great Republic, and keep its flame of liberty bright for future generations.

Thank you,

Christy Chesterton
Director of Advancement

P.S. — For questions or comments about the “Essential Liberty Project,” contact us at EssentialLiberty@PatriotPost.US

Political Essay, THE SAVING of AMERICA

THE SAVING of AMERICA
Ridding Corruption, Strengthening Freedoms, Reiterating the Constitution

This special paper is written from the heart and soul of an American patriot! It will be evident that all paths point toward using the current systems we have in place to achieve much needed change – but now change back to supporting our long standing practices, formative documents, and a way of life which has come to be known as America, filled with Americans. For those who live and practice this way of life, this culture, this set of fiercely held rights and freedoms, the rapid changes being jammed through an ill-prepared set of governmental levels incapable of withstanding any pressures, or to be independent in thoughts, words, and deeds, and to operate within a near frozen state of affairs, it is clearly a time of threat and disaster for our people! The very way of life we have all known is most clearly under attack – and mostly from an insidious inside quietly building structure that bodes of takeovers and power grabbing and central control! It is the source of novels and movies, but now becomes ever more threatening and foreboding as looming up to be a reality, and sooner than later we fear.

Much talk, town hall meetings, tea parties, small gatherings, and some media coverage have disclosed the real belief set of many Americans, producing fellow citizens, who are beginning to see and immediately feel intimidated and threatened by such emerging overwhelmingly clear moves on behalf of several governmental levels across the land. These moves are not done at random. They are a part of large-scale planning and often corruption-based processes that eat away at the current systems. The efforts will kill America as we know it and certainly leave us easier prey for foreign domination ahead. There seems to be no end to the forced rapid wholesale changes, no caps upon expenditures, and there is no depth to the ever so near cancerous wide scale attacks aimed at “restructuring” virtually everything we see and know as America! The people by and large do not want this, and now are a gathering force to remove such changes from being considered in their current introduced fashion. But it seems everyone right now is involved with what amounts to putting out brush fires, one Bill at a time. Instead, the suggested approach herein strikes at the very heart of the root causes that allow such Bills to be turned out to begin with and not reviewed and not run past the people. In a voting republic it is the people who hold and grant power.

It is clearly a time to introduce this model for “the saving of America” contained here in what amounts to a start up process upon which to modify, expand, and hone into a more perfect document with which to better organize around a central plan of action to best accommodate change now and in the future! The hope is that after being effectively improved, this or some perfected facsimile may serve as a marching-plan for action with defined steps that should appeal to a broad array of Americans who see and now better understand the dangerous way things are moving. The elements referenced and listed herein are not by any means exhaustive, nor do they represent any particular order of events or planning stages. They are essential elements upon which our people can speak to these governments and achieve perhaps a slowing of destructive forces while setting things back to many of the original good aspects for operating our great country. It is time for a clear “we the people” movement while fervor is high, while current systems still persist to allow and support orderly change, and when the threat looms so distinctly above the short horizon. More people are signing on for action. More people seek a set of steps or a clear action set to follow in setting things back closer to “right”. It is not right what is happening before us today and more urgently what is happening behind the scenes in such an insidious manner we will all wake up some day in total disarray and incredible dismay if solid change to place brakes on all this is not quickly forthcoming. While this process is urgent, it is also fairly easy to couple it all with setting standards that impact this saving of America concept far into the future. None of any of this is associated with ease of success, nor is it trouble free, or not without costs. The people are finally standing up, after trillions in obligated expenditures we do not have, which impose future generations beyond our wildest imaginations with a crushing debt that will force many bad sacrifices upon our way of life ahead, and are now loudly speaking out. They seem to all cry out “what can we do” or “how do we get better organized to fight all this with success” or “what plan can we get on board with for action”? Is it finally time now that we shall follow the start of a good plan and band together forcefully to achieve our mandates and urgent needs for getting our governments back to the people?

This is offered as just an early model to do just that – to get the people back owning their governments as intended in our most revered and durable founding documents. It is terrifying to hear national spokespersons pushing for “nebulous change” stating that this wonderful Constitution has seen its better days for America! We cannot and shall not let degradation take us down. We must absolutely gather our very best forces and long-standing banding together approaches to fight this off with every fiber in our bodies and souls!! Lack of taking responsible part in appropriate action, avoiding lethargy and involvement-dormancy on such survival issues, and not being solid well-informed participating members of our great republic must override any values that deter one single individual from this most urgent task that lies ahead now! It is time to take the fight onward with getting our governments back under control of and for the people.

The following listing then hits at the very foundation principles at work to turn controlled anarchy into organization. It is this list as added to which becomes a beacon in hard and threatening times to move us back toward what most of us grew up with and expected to be around as America for the future. It is not backward thinking at all, but instead serves to simply head in the direction of the successes that brought us to be the greatest and most benevolent society the world has ever known. Can this be a bad track to follow? Is there still room for improvements and positive change to make it a more perfect union – certainly there is, but all become a complete moot point if our systems cannot work for us as a nation of individuals with a common cause of preserving this union now! It is urged that people, thinkers, doers, and all people who truly care about our country take this list of action-oriented steps together with modifications onward to become a marching call to action. Just passing rather simple legislation aimed at righting where we have gone and what we are becoming shall serve us all quite well indeed!

After reviewing this start-up list for real steps to take it should engender the basic logic in organizational theory that drives the real process forward to achieve magnificent success! Begin with basic areas calling out for being firmly addressed by we the people to be maintained solidly within our governmental practices and operations now and in the future. Move also to shore up via legislation the full scope of monitoring and regulating government itself by the peoples’ imposed priorities and wishes as expressed through the democratic process. Then cover some broad ranging issues that help reset the national priorities as to the special relationship elected representatives have to their constituents and the nation as a whole. All of this will not require a one thousand page Bill at all, but rather be worded with systematic and clear language to simply get the job done of resetting Americas’ operating principles and character in doing the business that is the assigned purview of government. The list begins:

1. Start with resetting strong mandates for the process of elections such that full credibility and faith in outcomes shall be assured, with zero tolerance for any variances. This principle is the very essence of any democracy and must be adhered to ever so faithfully. To watch irregularities and outright scamming with elections makes our country now no different than those so called third world places we spend billions upon nation-building efforts and send representatives to monitor their elections as somehow being less effective without watchdogs. To enforce this creed, very strong sanctions shall have to be attached that call for speedy investigations and very firm severe penalties for any violations whatsoever. Would be “tamperers” should know full well that prison time looms large for improprieties within this scope of government affairs!! It is absolutely imperative that every election at every level must absolutely be honest, forthright, and fully transparent in every way in order to assure the essence of democratic function!!! Complete credibility in preserving this almost sacred basis for assuring honest outputs and accountability to every voter is paramount to promoting a continuation of our nation and culture! This should be made almost a unique area of law to maintain full integrity at high costs for improprieties.
2. Provide a very clear process for automatic expulsion from any elected office where any significant appearance of impropriety exists. This is paramount as to assuring that corruption, elitism, scandal, and other major disruptive distractions away from the task at hand as assigned by that office from the people is not allowed to ever take-away from focused work and positive accomplishment. It is aimed at soliciting candidates who go into each office who shall serve as role models for the constituency and work diligently at the tasks at hand and challenges to do right at every turn. Each such candidate must see and accept that this is an urgent mandate and that any personal gain shall wait until the office functions have been properly discharged and following exit from that office before any gain shall accrue whatsoever.
3. Take measures to place office holders onto the very programs and benefits that they voted on for the people in the general population. Make sure salaries and other basic compensation are most adequate in every way for the job, but assure as well they get no elite-like special treatment. Things like special retirement plans, exceptional insurance coverage, and side special significant advantages do not accrue to the office holder while in place working for the people. Any personal aggrandizement or untoward gains shall be dealt with immediately as an immediate expulsion. This measure is aimed at setting the standard that office holders are there to dedicate a service to that office function, without personal gain until they leave office, and much like the country’s founders they shall serve in good stead unless and until they leave or are forcefully removed by not adhering to sound principles and ethics in every way. A system should be provided to promote that person who was discharged to be tried as in all courts and if found not guilty then the government shall provide a major portion of their campaign funds to re-acquire that office. This approach is often far less costly than the corruption or scandal eliciting the original complaint.
4. Provide for a process of assuring a timely automatic recall election related to any office holder who shall have changed parties in term or altered major stated principles upon which their election was founded, as well as, for any significant reason that the constituency is somehow disenfranchised as to work product or outcomes. This principle will assure voters that affinity to the principles espoused by the candidates upon whom they voted shall be faithfully and strongly held fast by their representative during the course of that office term. Further, such elections required by law should be supported in some measure by the highest government to offset local mandates for funding same. Other called for special or recall elections as provided for all constituencies shall be facilitated as to being implemented into action such that all elected office holders immediately become more subject to the wishes of the people – they become once again true “representatives” of their constituency for whom they are accountable. Insincere, hollow, or erroneous statements made in a campaign should be deliverables backed by firm actions for removal or malfeasance regulations in the absence of faithful adherence since much of any vote to acquire that office will have been made on such unfounded rhetoric or hollow promises. In the modern era of widespread media and communication sources, this can be easily tracked, stored in databases, and dealt with correctly by would be supporters who wasted a vote due to misstatements by candidates or insincere ramblings made in haste just to seek success at the polls. Accountability at every stage of an election process should reign supreme in assuring honesty and forthrightness by all concerned, with consequences in the failure to do so!
5. Take measures to provide for strong penalties upon office holders found guilty of creating or participating in distractions or disruptive behaviors of a personal or official nature that diminishes the credibility, function, or product of any office. This aimed at holding force over such candidates to become model office holders focused upon delivery of accomplished positive work product or upon bona fide efforts to play a positive role in negotiations or compromise within reason to achieve results beneficial to their constituency and the nation as a whole. This should include the production of requested source documents or other key elements to the constituency in making a determination of relevant facts regarding any need to pursue removal efforts or re-direct the official to be more closely attuned to the full constituency or the nation as a whole, with the threat of removal looming always over malfeasance or significant ruse in discharging duties. No constituency should support or permit wide variance from the expectations they voted for at any time, and they cannot rely on any ethics committee to assure true compliance as this is an insider approach most clearly.
6. Provide for office holders to thoroughly review and deliberate from an informed position any and all proposed legislation coming before their body for proposed action. This to assure the basic logic of not avoiding the principles of informed consent, ethics in practical political delivery systems, and in assuring their constituency that all is understood with the implications and impact upon that district prior to voting upon any such proposed legislation. There are many avenues and safety guards to build into such a purposeful set of action expectations to accomplish this assurance. Furthermore, it should include requirements that any and all legislation is a product of elected officials and established committees rather than independent non-elected persons or organizations. Getting back to real representation of one’s constituency is paramount to success in saving America! Failure to review and fully understand any proposed action by the body as a whole shall be defined as a significant ethical breach if participation in a positive vote is undertaken. It would seem that setting the stage for facilitating well-considered “no” votes would be supportive of slowing any rush for action under fear-mongering to get something passed as an emergency.
7. See that all proposed legislation have an absolute required safety net for public review and comment, and that special requirements to avoid any too rapid an action shall be spelled-out, and further that each representative shall hold deliberations with a widely representative sample of constituents involving each and every Bill proposed for action. This should be associated with timely posting on official web sites via the internet for reasonable time periods as to promote widespread understanding, full transparency, and open discussion regarding any and every such proposed legislation or implementation, and as shall be proposed for change over time. It should be considered as a significant breach of ethics to avoid or delay such deliberations and complete awareness efforts, with opportunity for thorough comment.
8. Take care to assure each office holder shall make every effort possible to be fully inclusive to constituents in every way practical without ruse or subterfuge in performing within the bounds of office as expected and set out by the people for whom this representative works in every way to their betterment and awareness. This provided to hold elected officials in office to certain standard expectations held as valued by the people of that district or for the nation’s best interest as a whole. Assurances, oaths, and pledges notwithstanding, each official shall be mindful of penalties for not adhering closely to such basic foundation principles in effecting a work product from that office. Communication in thorough fashion to and within a constituency is key to any success at serving in office.
9. Take actions to provide for a special oversight monitoring process comprised of appropriate and fair representation of constituents to allow outside review of office holders’ performance within the confines of duties as provided by the people. This process adds a special formal citizen level review and oversight methodology to each office outside the bounds of any current internal monitoring provisions by various committees and too closely associated bodies. This oversight process must be spelled out and given proper careful thought as to implementation expectations along with fixed proper authority to deal effectively with serious matters disclosed. This overall level of monitoring is aimed at assuring that representatives also be mindful of not being impervious to expectations by constituents at all times and in all matters of their office and behaviors. Give certain “incentives” for the media and press to assure proper, thorough, and honest coverage on urgent matters that may affect performance as well.
10. Provide for methods to absolutely assure that any and all officials both appointed and elected who have certain defined levels of executive authority shall be thoroughly vetted with proper oversight to deny service appointments as determined. This to stop or better control the “czar phenomenon” and other widespread discretionary abuses of authority outside the parameters of any transparently open, fair, or thorough processes known and supported by the people in discharging any governmental business, advice, consultation, or other matters of significance related to conduct of any official functioning within or to another office. No such “officials” of any nature may participate in developing or drafting proposed legislation or implementing same whatsoever without having been properly vetted beyond any reasonable doubt as to ability and qualifications to so serve, as well as having sworn to fully uphold the Constitution completely and without reservation.
11. Provide significant penalties for any malfeasance or proven corruption in office both of an official or personal nature that may cast disparity upon any functioning within such office. This to make sure that all matters relating office holders to function and output levels are always and forever faithful to ethics and standards of behaviors that may affect their discharge of duties in some manner so as to lessen potential for positive impact. Not only shall they be immediately removed from such office pursuant to above provisions, but also, significantly more aggressive prosecution shall adhere to these special instances due to the impact and lofty position their office has upon the system as a whole and based in then widely known expectations held aloft for public officials to perform properly with dignity, within legal bounds in all ways, and under unusually exceptional standards for ethics.
12. Provide for a generally more facilitated process for calling for recall elections, impeachments, and other removals from office – the modifications aimed at dealing with major misleading campaign promises, significantly altered positions from what the people voted for based in stated positions of candidates, and in effecting a control feature upon which the constituency may settle foremost divergences from what is held as reasonable in faithful discharge of duties to the people and the Constitution. This to always make it plausible and potentially real to any office holder that not living up to nor not seeking every effort to accommodate campaign pledges shall not stand. Further, that each candidate and office holder must be cognizant of direction, discussions, promises, stated positions, and as these relate to output, must be kept closely in mind or most thoroughly and openly discussed with the full constituency prior to or as an integral part of any such alterations proposed as being necessary. Simply put, if an elected representative falters or fails to live up to positions as stated, the constituency shall have the power to make change as desired for meshing better with the reality of what is the will of the people. In a time of internet and other effective forms of mass communication, it should recognized and accepted that widespread input, feedback, review, and comment shall be quite available to any constituency more readily than ever before, and should be used as a tool for any such proposed change or operational status that is different from stated positions. Each and all officials both elected and appointed shall take a solemn oath to work within and support the Constitution, and further that any and all actions be afforded and required to justify any positions taken as related to being within the confines and under the Constitution, with adequate opportunity for the constituency to question or boldly challenge the appropriateness as upholding the Constitution. Power back to the people with an ever-present awareness of whom elected officials are ultimately accountable to is essential to a nation’s survival as a free state.
13. See that any subterfuge or unethical relationship in the discharge of duties especially as may be related to constitutional aspects by any elected official or any designee shall result in an impeachment or removal from office pursuant to this new legislation. This done to assure straightforward discharge of duties and transparency extraordinaire on all aspects of an office holder. Any unusual or unreasonable special deal-cutting or questionable relationships including from any lobby or political action committee or public interest group shall also bear down upon ethical conduct this having been done outside the most informative communication with the constituency as a whole.
14. Take extra efforts to redefine the separation of powers, authority, and function between various built in checks and balances provided for safeguarding of all governmental organizations and performance functions. This done to minimize conflicts of abuse of powers or discharge of duties by usurping un-granted authority to meet other purposes than those assigned by the people. Make sure government is owned by we the people, that elected officials know for sure who they are entirely accountable to, and see that lines are not crossed without consequences if full and thorough communication with enough specificity contained therein to be fully grasped by any constituency toward complete understanding on issues and consequences involved was not provided in a timely manner.
15. Provide for assurance that in any Bill as proposed, clear funding mechanisms and available logic to fully satisfy without deficit spending any and all aspects of such proposed change are present. The current excessive spending far beyond anyone’s rational thought can grasp is all that must be stated here to justify the urgency of such an inclusion to save America now!
16. Add in language to assure that in any tax levy proposed to be imposed at any level, a super-majority shall be required before the people or any groups are actually taxed as proposed. This done to promote full discovery and understanding of the dynamics involved, with complete opportunity for comment by any party regarding any aspects that have deleterious effects or unintended consequences as stated by any presenter. For any governmental body or elected official to usurp authority outside the bounds of the Constitution or somehow exclude themselves or others in avoiding full and honest participation as provided in established transparent laws pursuant to tax initiatives should result in removal from office.
17. Establish a clear practice to allow a legislative overview, monitoring, and veto by super-majority any and all judicial power or expressions, and further create language to override within defined parameters any Executive Order that is determined usurping of authority, unconstitutional, or detrimental to the common good. This done to promote better separation of powers and to assure the avoidance of any judicial policy, legislative, or political intervention. The stated principles of the Constitution leave such matters to the fully founded representative bodies. It is likely that some language to override lifetime tenure within the judiciary be instituted as well to help in alleviating any amassing of power or delving beyond the boundaries built into the checks and balances principles by any judiciary level. As to Executive Orders, some degree of oversight and super-majority veto process would secure better restraints upon the wielding of unlimited powers found to be contrary to the public welfare.
18. Consider instituting a form of sunset clause to help eliminate automatic or “over-tenure” for agencies and funded organizations such that each year a vote to continue support, reorganize funding levels, institute desired modifications in process or function, and other determined needs may be handled by the legislative funding source to control too much independence or regulate power bases appropriately, as well as address emerging funding outlays altogether. This done for obvious budgetary purposes as well as more appropriate control over function within a constantly emerging governmental arena. This could be one of the most fair and yet powerful monetary control points dealing with any budget or deficit issue confronted by any legislative body. The fairness and honesty required in dealing systematically and in some more standardized approach with such issues by any elected official or body would be bound by the above provisions for holding abuse of power or unethical decision making as a cause for removal.
19. Reaffirm and strengthen the military’s role and relationship in all this such that freedoms and liberties under the Constitution are clearly maintained and supported. This done to preserve a special relationship and careful balance between the military, the people, and their government within a free society, and to assure any actions that go outside the bounds of granted authority shall be ultimately under control.
20. Set effective and appropriate term limits for every level of office. This done as a long time much needed change to support the tendency to break long-tenure based insider and corruption-based office holding. There is often a positive relationship between length in office and amount of potential for caving in to untoward influence or exercise of corruption. Term limits, while not popular with office holders, is a topic whose time has come. The time is now for the people to reclaim their government and to hold as a singular high standard the desire that candidates run for office and then serve to provide a solid service to their country while in office, then leave before long-tenure creates fertile ground for malfeasance or blatantly bad choices. While this entire proposed set of required change is being more or less forced upon representatives by a new forceful constituency, this is the time to also include the positive purging effect that comes with term limits if overall elitism and corruption are to be throttled.

This set of new provisions should be founded in simplicity, spelled out in detail, and work fast to thwart any continued ruinous excessive spending or malfeasance in office now and in the future. Anything destructive of freedoms or ethics or aimed at incremental usurping of any authority outside the bounds of our great Constitution should be dealt with responsibly and swiftly by all others who do support and uphold this most functional and hallowed formative document. It is a rather well known principle that freedoms once diminished are most difficult if ever to re-attain by any people! A most serious effort is underway in America to move toward a centrist and more socialized system overall that endangers each and every freedom, and free people must step up to the job of thwarting and controlling such moves at any cost.

Many of these areas listed above are needed now just to place firm brakes upon further abuses of promised changes cleverly disguised as appropriate change for the better, all the while costing ever too much for our futures. It is time to set the stage to clean up our government bodies! As this essay if being prepared, reliable polls show an overwhelming 57%+ of the American voting public wish to see the entire Congress fully replaced now! This does not include any questioning to explore the rapidly deteriorating support for the Executive Branch and parallel feelings about any desired replacement like the Congress. Even in the same poll, Congressional support is at the all-time low point of 37% approval rating, regardless of party! That is a true shame and almost scandalous to call them leaders at all! It is time to take decisive steps to rid practices and policies that lead us all down the road of such a deteriorated situation. To permit, or allow, or support people we do not trust, do not hold in approved favor, wish to replace, and who by and large hold us all in contempt when we speak out is ludicrous to the extreme when we expect them to make rational, informed, wise, and prudent decisions on a representative basis for us all.

What has occurred over many years of public inattentiveness like a creeping form of cancer is that the American public caught up in their own wonderful lives come to believe that freedom and liberties enjoyed now have a high degree of anticipated permanence about them. Often the very existence of a concept like liberty becomes elusive and automatically assumed, even if ill defined, especially for those who have enjoyed it all of their lives! It is this very high level of assumed continued and expected presence of liberty and freedom that makes for their being far too often taken for granted by a silent hard-working productive population! The mere fact of so many concentrating such effort on being productive patriotic citizens that makes for a certain type of vulnerability since attention is stretched away from some political issues at hand.

Now, implementation has some special issues and will be very controversial, but once communication sets the stage for just the reduction in corruption, for the key changes in support of widely held concerns in operational style that legislative bodies have deteriorated into, and for reduction in elitism, many more will join to pressure and speak to forward such a finalized Bill that works for America! It will not be easy, but must be accomplished and soon! Implementation requires some elected representative or bound group of officials with selfless courage and conviction to introduce the perfected legislative version for consideration. Almost any organized constituency can rise up to seek introduction of such a Bill if certain assurances are made in advance about protecting that official in their own district. It would also most clearly be up to the people with open stated positions to remove at the next election any official who cannot support the tenets of such a targeted Bill aimed at saving America from itself. The people MUST stand up for the challenge and deliver on the force necessary to literally make each of their representatives buy-off on something so basic as apple pie in support of better safeguarded and functional leadership within an elected or appointed office. To not support and not to vote for approval will be adequate testimony to assure defeat and removal by the constituency!

Again, it is also very imperative that any such representative bringing this new proposal forward in an effort to save America from itself be most fully protected by the constituency to assure that reprisals do not thwart the effort or underlying purpose in forwarding these finally evolved and stated principles. The person or persons doing such a brave and egalitarian service will either serve in good stead from a thankful constituency or be labeled for impudence followed with retaliation over time to wrongfully render them ineffective. An absolute essential in all this is to make sure each district constituency seek to literally place each elected official on notice that the Bill must be approved, and should their representative fail to approve and endorse the very basics contained therein, it shall be defined as cause for removal at the earliest possible time! To fail in supporting anti-corruption, anti-elitism, anti-insider benefits, and in supporting a closer relationship with that constituency is tantamount to being FOR such disruptive negatives thus warranting removal! These basics should automatically have wide appeal for all citizens regardless of party affiliation or personal beliefs since this process of saving America is an appeal to logic and to saving much in the way of waste in time, effort, funding, and corruption! This cry for universal banding together in the foundation approach to resolving such overriding issues is in reality not likely to be universal at all, but it must go forward and in so doing virtually every American is placed on much firmer ground to fight other issues ahead and to resolve the fact that under our Constitutional system we all win for a long time to come!!

It is obvious that most such officials shall NOT like to see or hear any such proposed modifications within our “insider” political structure and operational systems, but nonetheless a brave heart backed totally and unequivocally by a well-banded constituency shall have done the ultimate selfless service for the country as a whole and for a long time to come as well. It MUST be made to be clearly universally known that anyone not supporting fully and rapidly such new provisions shall be rendered themselves as ineffective and removed at the first election opportunity with no reservations from a well coordinated constituency capable of placing such crucial nation-wide priorities above personal or localized desires. This whole concept should place all potential candidates on notice that to run for public service means just that, but now with even more of a mandate from we the people! Again, that constituency that spawned the Bill introduction must stand firmly for their brave and courageous representative to serve notice to all others in what shall be ahead for each dissenter. The absolute time to render improved methods of relating our government to us under a more effective and ethical/legal manner is upon us now! It is time to reclaim the near-sacred position of returning our representative system back to the people for the people whose consent must be granted before the existence for any act of being governed!

Epilogue for Extension:

There are clearly more areas that should be addressed in detail while better organized and more solid housecleaning is underway. It would be difficult to arrange these under the suggested legislative mandate continued in this proposed listing, but all are nonetheless most urgent as well! Most of these have been listed and discussed far more eloquently than can be done here. One such location is in the popular book by Mark Levin entitled Liberty and Tyranny, spelling out in the last chapter a regular “manifesto” for action. Some are added in addition here to make for suggested expansion of this detailed list for rapid and thorough action. This is a suggested parallel listing to develop and institute outside the bounds of the above essay listing capable of being encapsulated with one proposed omnibus piece of legislative move, yet still is part and parcel to any saving of America from itself oriented set of laws and regulations. The list is as follows:

• Set the stage for a considered and yet rapid set of repeal actions to diminish what are seen as most expensive, destructive, less than effective, and unpopular legislative changes recently set into or proposed for law.
• Deal with taxation issues to resolve the unfairness in progressive income tax and more as described in that book.
• On the environment, take actions to avoid the unparalleled granting of tax-exempt status to all organizations, and avoid allowing environmental regulations be put into place that effectively really set industrial policy and diminish the nation’s standard of living.
• Limit the Judiciary power to prevent intervention into political and policy decisions, since the Constitution leaves this to the legislative branches.
• Take education largely out of the realm for Federal intervention, as it is primarily a state and local affair and mandate.
• Adopt English as at the primary national language and make for expected assimilation of immigrants, seal borders, and enforce current immigration laws.
• Contain, limit, and reform entitlement programs altogether, avoid creating more centrist entitlement areas like nationalized health coverage and more.
• Ensure that all foreign policy decisions are made for the singular purpose of preserving and improving American society, and avoid all entanglements that may supplant American sovereignty.
• Oppose all efforts to denude the nation of its founding justification – that is, God-given unalienable, natural rights that the government can neither confer nor deny to individuals.
• Demand that all public servants, elected or appointed, at all times uphold the Constitution and justify their public acts under the Constitution, and that enforcement of all improprieties against public action by officials that are contrary to this basic principle shall be thoroughly addressed with gusto.

To further quote from Levin’s book, “conservatives are alarmed by the ascent of a soft tyranny and its acceptance by (so many). A free people living in a civil society, working in self-interested cooperation, and a government operating within the limits of its authority promote more prosperity, opportunity, and happiness for more people than any alternative. Conservatism (and government by and for the people) is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles.” It is time now to get back under the wise and well-founded guidance and protection of our Constitution in every way possible in pursuit of a freedom and liberty-based nation! It is time to reclaim by we the people the very government that has gravitated away from the basics!